Project Details
Projekt Print View

SFB 1288:  Practices of comparisons: Ordering and changing the world

Subject Area Social and Behavioural Sciences
Humanities
Term since 2017
Website Homepage
Project identifier Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) - Project number 317664947
 
University rankings, Nobel Prize awards, racist analogies—practices of comparing are omnipresent and play a crucial role in the past and the present. They shape the behaviour of a myriad of actors in business, culture, science, and politics. Consequently, the Collaborative Research Centre (CRC) 1288 investigates the history of comparative practices from Antiquity to the present. The central object of our research envelope the social and cultural causes, the procedures, and the effects of comparing. The CRC established a new research agenda that transforms common thinking about identities and differences into a complex relational figure: when actors compare, they determine—based on an assumption of similarity—the difference and similarity of at least two objects of comparison (comparata) with respect to at least one third (tertium). Comparative practices are neither neutral, disinterested, nor timeless, but productive and performative: with the help of socially shared comparative practices, actors create the comparata and tertia that underlie these practices. We first developed conceptual typologies and identified vital features of Eurocentric comparative practices, making so-called Western modernity visible as the construction of an effective comparatum. We were then able to demonstrate—with the help of practical theoretical concepts—the dynamics of comparing: comparative practices do not just differ in their modes of execution, their addressed audience, and their media; they also change over time—depending on whether a prestructured world order was to be made visible by making comparisons or whether comparative practices were aimed at creating and establishing an order first. The second phase aims to explore the productive power of comparing and determine the relationship between change and stabilization on the intermediate level. The analysis of practice formations, communities of practice, and modes of comparison puts the mesolevel of comparative practices at the centre of the second phase. Before we turn to the macroprocesses of historical change in the third phase, we shall be examining how actors generate long-term knowledge, how they produce and shape their comparata and tertia, and how this consolidates or changes beyond concrete contexts. The next phase is organized into three project areas: (D) Generating and stabilizing knowledge, (E) Limits of comparing, and (F) Standardization and Globalization. The central questions are: How could comparative practices be established over a longer duration? How were they changed and stabilized? Which boundaries were drawn? But also: What standardizing and partly globalizing effects did they have? According to our thesis, it is possible with the help of the change in comparative practices, not only to examine global historical processes but also to re-establish periodizations. We are making a contribution to the long-term research goal of developing a contingency-sensitive theory of historical change
DFG Programme Collaborative Research Centres

Current projects

Completed projects

Applicant Institution Universität Bielefeld
Participating University Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena
Spokespersons Professorin Dr. Angelika Epple, until 4/2021; Professorin Dr. Antje Flüchter, since 5/2021
 
 

Additional Information

Textvergrößerung und Kontrastanpassung